A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Invalid argument supplied for foreach()

Filename: twitter_timeline/pi.twitter_timeline.php

Line Number: 440

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/dirtyoil/public_html/cms/codeigniter/system/core/Exceptions.php:170)

Filename: core/Common.php

Line Number: 408

Kinder Morgan pipeline project in for an increasingly rocky ride - News - Dirty Oil Sands

Kinder Morgan pipeline project in for an increasingly rocky ride - News - Dirty Oilsands

Home » News » Kinder Morgan pipeline project in for an increasingly rocky ride

News


Kinder Morgan pipeline project in for an increasingly rocky ride

News Articles Featured | MICHAEL SMYTH | THE PROVINCE | December 09, 2012

Read the full article on the originating site

There was a time when pipeline projects were so common and boring they wouldn’t need a public-relations campaign or saturation advertising to sell them.

But that was before climate change, the Alberta oilsands, the Deepwater Horizon disaster and the pipeline rupture that made a mess of the Kalamazoo River. It was before heightened public concern over oil tankers off the B.C. coast, and long before a ­company called Enbridge proposed the Northern Gateway pipeline, and unleashed B.C.’s biggest environmental battle in a generation.

The Enbridge project has become a political flashpoint in the province, with the NDP’s ­Adrian Dix firmly opposed to it, and Premier Christy Clark’s Liberals laying down strict conditions for supporting it. But while the politicians and pundits duke it out over Enbridge — and the company soaks the airwaves with pro-pipeline ads — another company called Kinder Morgan is quietly going about its business. It’s B.C.’s ­“other pipeline”: the $4-billion proposal to twin the existing TransMountain connection from Alberta to Burnaby.

Like Enbridge, the company wants to pump heavy diluted bitumen from the oilsands to the B.C. coast, where it would be loaded onto tankers for shipment to Asia. Oil-tanker traffic would swell from the current five to 25 ships per month. But unlike Enbridge, there’s been no massive ad campaign, though one might come later. For now, Kinder Morgan has opted for a series of lower-profile town hall meetings along the pipeline route.

“We’ve taken a very local approach,” says Ian Anderson, president of Kinder Morgan ­Canada. “The team working on the project is based in Vancouver, and the people meeting one-to-one in the communities are British Columbians.”

The town hall events feature fresh-faced young people staffing the information displays. A couple of friendly and casually dressed company officials — Michael Davies and Greg Toth — lead the sessions.

Not a Calgary power suit in sight.

The low-key approach seems to be working for the company, which has taken much less flak than Enbridge in the province’s pipeline wars.

But that could change. Protesters have appeared at most of Kinder Morgan’s events — “we know them by name now,” Davies jokes — though the biggest excitement before last week was a streaker flashing by in Nanaimo.

Then the tour hit Victoria, and a busload of protesters drove up and swarmed the meeting. (Yes, that would be a bus powered by ­fossil fuel.) The protesters took down the company’s information displays and sat on them, preventing the public from seeing them. A few of the company’s placards were torn and vandalized with markers.

“It was very unfortunate and disappointing it would come to that,” Anderson said.

“It deprived a lot of people of an opportunity to learn about the project.”

The protesters, though, called their intervention a “victory” in the fight against oil tankers, and chided the company for ending the event early.

“When the community shows up with real concerns, and challenges the misinformation the company is spreading, instead of engaging in dialogue Kinder Morgan reps shut down the open house,” said Eric Nordal from the group Social Coast. The incident could signal a ­growing militancy among opponents of the Kinder Morgan project, and the fight could take on Enbridge-scale proportions as the proposal moves forward. And that will make the politics of this thing even trickier than it already is.

While Adrian Dix has soundly condemned the proposed Enbridge pipeline, the NDP leader has remained officially neutral on Kinder Morgan, saying the company has not officially applied for a pipeline permit yet. It’s a technical loophole Dix has seized to avoid taking a position on an increasingly controversial issue that could end up dividing his own party.

Consider that George Heyman, the NDP’s recently nominated high-profile candidate in Vancouver-Fairview, is the former head of the Sierra Club, a fierce opponent of the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Christy Clark has already called for a “fair share” of pipeline profits in return for the Liberals’ support of the project, a condition Kinder Morgan has endorsed in principle. Now, as the May election approaches, watch for Dix to fall under increasing pressure to say where he stands, and watch for Kinder Morgan to have a tougher time flying under the radar in B.C.’s escalating pipeline wars.

 

Tagged with: pipeline, kinder morgan, opposition, ndp

News

Alberta’s carbon tax is a bold move. Sadly, it’s not enough

April 05, 2013 (Tzeporah Berman | The Globe and Mail)

Energy board changes pipeline complaint rules

April 05, 2013 (Gloria Galloway | The Globe and Mail)

CP oil spill in northern Ontario larger than first reported

April 04, 2013 (Nathan Vanderklippe | The Globe and Mail)

Subscribe to The Dirt, the best weekly review of tar sands and pipeline campaign news and commentary.

* indicates required

@dirtyoilsands On Twitter