IPCC to Canada: shut down the tar sands - Blog - Dirty Oilsands

Home » Blog » IPCC to Canada: shut down the tar sands

Blog

IPCC to Canada: shut down the tar sands

By Lisa McCrummen

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Yesterday, the head of IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, made a bold statement : Canada’s oil sands should be shut down.

While there’s no reaction so far from Canada’s PM Harper – wouldn’t it be amazing if a few top climate journalists were able to get him to comment?

Clearly his modus operandi is not to discuss the world’s growing backlash against the climate, environmental or health issues that are part of Canada’s dirty oil sands ‚Äòsuper’ energy package. He only took one question from journalists last week and didn’t utter a peep when international environmental groups ‚Äòouted’ Canada’s dirty oil sands in the U.S. Behind the scenes Harper tried to win special treatment during his meeting with Obama to grow the US addiction on Canada’s oil sands – 33 new refineries, thousands of miles of pipelines and even tanker traffic are part of the vision. Not the kind of plan the world is asking for to curb greenhouse gas emissions. (Last week Dr. James Hansen also urged Canada’s Oil Sands expansions to be stopped).

Luckily for Harper, his oil posse is there for him. And last week they were livid. They are fighting the potential low-carbon transportation fuel mandates which would not allow super-carbon-emissions fuels like the dirty oil to be sold. They got out a letter urging National Security Adviser James Jones to study how they could affect imports of Canadian oil sands. – upping their rhetoric (and protecting their investment) by trying to paint oil sands as an important ‚Äòenergy security’ source.

Depends on how you view national/climate security: I highly doubt Rajendra Pachauri would agree with the oil industry’s (aka ConsumerEnergyAlliance) letter that upping the US dependence on the world’s dirtiest oil is encouraging: (A snippet from the letter: "Last year, the United States imported 1.5 million barrels of oil a day derived from the Canadian oil sands, and thanks to projects such as the Alberta Clipper, that number is expected to climb to 4.3 million barrels a day over the next two decades. This is encouraging news." )

Neither would top US military leaders and Military National Security think tanks. They are telling the US administration that combating climate by getting off fossil fuels must be the top National Security priority.

Today’s UN Climate Meeting is a serious moment for world leaders. There’s a new world reality because of global warming that must recognized and acted upon; the oil sands industry and friends of the dirty oil sands industry are not the leaders we need.

Tagged with: national security, ipcc

News

Alberta’s carbon tax is a bold move. Sadly, it’s not enough

April 05, 2013 (Tzeporah Berman | The Globe and Mail)

Energy board changes pipeline complaint rules

April 05, 2013 (Gloria Galloway | The Globe and Mail)

CP oil spill in northern Ontario larger than first reported

April 04, 2013 (Nathan Vanderklippe | The Globe and Mail)

Subscribe to The Dirt, the best weekly review of tar sands and pipeline campaign news and commentary.

* indicates required

@dirtyoilsands On Twitter

14 hours, 26 minutes ago
Hey fans we need your help! Our Reality Check video on oil sands - with 25 facts actually checked by renowned... http://t.co/g2PChxFu3y
1 day, 7 hours, 56 minutes ago
Having a hard time cutting through the government and industry spin on the oil sands? Visit... http://t.co/iCmf7CR9mG
1 day, 18 hours, 37 minutes ago
New York Times Sunday Review, editorial: "In his State of the Union speech, [President Obama] promised to take... http://t.co/P03tD0MBBN